You’ve done the hard work. The budget’s built. The plan is solid. Now it’s time to roll it out. You may be delivering the first draft to a Budget & Finance Committee or the Board. If you are in a state that requires the proposed budget to be sent to homeowners in advance of adoption, or are blessed with governing documents mandating owner approval of the budget, there will be a second roll out. This can be where your mettle is tested. The bigger the fee increase, the higher the level of anxiety. This segment gives you tools to help.

The Big Roll Out – First Draft

The budget process should be a means by which communities set priorities. It’s an opportunity to imagine possibilities and a platform to make informed business decisions. Yet many associations short-circuit the process in the very first draft, usually out of fear. If the writers of the budget are constrained by an artificially-imposed limit (“we can’t afford anything above an x% increase” is a familiar refrain), the result will be less than optimal. Worse, a manager could use the budget to curry favor by playing the hero, even if it makes no sense. (Theoretically…I know YOU’D never play that game). Be skeptical of anyone who says “I’ve got great news – there will be no fee increase!” It MIGHT be true (see “Guts, Part One”).

Boards that don’t do their due diligence or that do not provide a space for professional managers to share difficult news may be setting themselves up for poor service.  Boards can blame management all they want for faulty budgeting, but they are ultimately responsible for the end result. Burying one’s head in the sand is a questionable strategy in the short term. In the long run, it becomes deadly when the tsunami strikes. Questioning and challenging assumptions doesn’t have to be a challenge to a manager’s professionalism. Done correctly, it’s a sign of an engaged Board (or Committee) and a healthy relationship. No one is perfect, and Committee and Board input results in a better quality product.

One of the best ways to avoid the trap of fee targeting is to treat the first draft a “kitchen sink” version. Include all worst case scenarios, contingencies, and even the wild ideas that might have come up over the course of the past year. This is the time to throw it out there.

A well thought out and well written cover memo is crucial. If the first draft results in a fee increase, the memo outlines the factors that contribute to the increase, preferably in order of impact. Your outstanding narrative already gives the details for each line item. The cover memo helps to put them into context and allows the group to see the impact of each possible expense. It makes it easier to prioritize. Non-priorities will disappear in draft #2. The cover memo is also an opportunity to explain any new line items or features of the draft, whether or not they impact fees.

Let the Data Speak & Make It Real

If you’ve done the hard work and woven it into the budget document, you’ll save time in budget meetings. When questions arise, you’ll be able to direct attention to the appropriate place in the document to answer most inquiries. There will always be a level of discretion in decisions on many line items. Opinions will matter. But if the data in the budget is thorough and accurate, it will help to drive the discussion. Get out of Opinionworld as fast as possible.

It’s hard to wrap your brain around large numbers. Breaking the number down is a great way to help a group decide if a particular expense is worth considering. Do the math. What is the cost per unit per month? The answer to “Is it worth the cost of a Starbucks coffee per week to beautify the front of the property?” provides way more context than “Should we spend another $2,500 on flowers?” Get out of Theoryworld as fast as possible.

What if the News is Really Scary?

Some associations are behind the proverbial 8-Ball. Like the community mentioned in the first segment in this series, the tsunami is upon them and they are facing some really tough choices. They may be in the unenviable position of playing catch up. They must create an action plan to address years of deferred maintenance and figure out how to pay for it. For the plan to be successful, the process must be communicated effectively to community members. This can be a source of considerable angst for board members and managers alike. It’s no time to wimp out on the disciplines and strategies already shared this and the first three segments in this series.

Here are a few successful strategies and perspectives employed by community association that have successfully dug out of the hole.

• Collect the Data: Get hard data from professionals as needed. Engineers, architects, lawyers, reserve analysts, and others have no dog in the fight. They are paid to advocate for the association. Work with those familiar with community associations who can communicate effectively with the board and community members.
• Share The News Like Voting in Chicago: Communicate early and often. When the data starts to roll in, share it, preferably well in advance of the budget process. Plan for town hall informational meetings. Plan for extra budget meetings before adoption. Share recaps of those meetings so that any who couldn’t attend get the information. Members likely have diverse backgrounds. Some may find it difficult to understand some of the information. Be patient and persistent. And don’t get angry when someone stands up at the last meeting and claims no one ever informed them about any of this. It happens.
• Assemble the Team: This can be an excellent opportunity to form an ad hoc committee. Expanding the board’s knowledge and talent base helps to address trust issues. Got detractors? Bring ‘em in the fold. Use the talents of the professionals who have provided the data that is driving the discussion. Have the committee volunteers and professionals play a part in presenting information at the town hall and other meetings.
• Show All Options: Lay out every possible option to the members, even those that the board or committee thinks are non-starters. There are three benefits to this; (1) a free flow of options may spur an innovative solution, (2) there is a good chance an uniformed member will claim the exercise is flawed because an option wasn’t considered, and (3) it allows the membership to be a part of the decision-making process and conclude for themselves some options are better than others. Buy-in is huge in these circumstances.
• There Ain’t No “Them”: The volunteers are going to have to pay, same as all their neighbors. A thorough, inclusive, and transparent process helps to break down the tendency for members to hold on to an artificial and damaging Us vs. Them mindset.
• It’s Not Personal: Managers and volunteers put themselves at risk of suffering personal attacks. It’s home. It’s money. So it IS personal to the members including volunteer leaders. But the process is not. It’s business. The strategies outlined above will help to mitigate distrust and anger, but for some it might not do the trick. If you’ve done everything you can, it’s good enough. It’s not on you unless you allow it. Never let negative people rent space in your mind (see Lesson #3 here).

And, Finally…

We’ve covered a lot of ground in the first four segments of this series! In the last one, we’ll share common budgeting goofs and how to avoid them.